Messages in this thread | | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9 | Date | 2 Dec 2002 16:03:44 -0800 |
| |
Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209030900410.1997-100000@home.transmeta.com> By author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > I wonder if the right answer isn't to just make things like "__u64" be > "long long" even on 64-bit architectures (at least those on which it is 64 > bit, of course. I _think_ that's true of all of them). And then just use > "llu" for it all. > > Of course, the really _best_ option would be to have gcc's printf string > format be extensible and dynamic. > > Davem, is sparc64 "long long" 64-bit? >
Some C libraries have "Ixx" as an extension meaning (u)intXX_t -- it's used in the same way as the other size modifiers, i.e. %I64x instead of %lx. This might be a useful extension to mimic.
-hpa -- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |