lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance
    Ulrich Drepper wrote:
    > Nakajima, Jun wrote:
    >
    >>AMD (at least Athlon, as far as I know) supports sysenter/sysexit. We tested it on an Athlon box as well, and it worked fine. And sysenter/sysexit was better than int/iret too (about 40% faster) there.
    >
    >
    > That's good to know but not what I meant.
    >
    > I referred to syscall/sysret opcodes. They are broken in their own way
    > (destroying ecx on kernel entry) but at least they preserve eip.
    >

    syscall is pretty much unusable unless the NMI is changed to a task
    gate. syscall does not change %esp on entry to the kernel, so an NMI
    before the manual stack switch would still use the user stack, which is
    not guaranteed to be valid - oops. x86-64 gets around this by using an
    interrupt stack, its replacement for task gates.

    --
    Brian Gerst

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.040 / U:0.428 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site