[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: rmap and nvidia?
Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, mdew wrote:
> > On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 22:38, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 10:36:10PM +1300, mdew wrote:
> > > > nv.c: In function `nv_get_phys_address':
> > > > nv.c:2182: warning: implicit declaration of function `pte_offset'
> > > > nv.c:2182: invalid type argument of `unary *'
> > >
> > > Use pte_offset_map() with a corresponding pte_unmap().
> >
> > err pardon?
> wli just gave you the information you need to create a patch
> for the nvidia driver.

The replies for people in the know (Rik, wli) give a clue but not an
answer. Use mere mortals want a proper patch in order to build and
use this kernel.

I will summarise my understanding so far; The original code says:

unsigned long
nv_get_phys_address(unsigned long address)
pgd_t *pg_dir;
pmd_t *pg_mid_dir;
pte_t *pte__, pte;
#if defined (pte_offset_atomic)
pte__ = pte_offset_atomic(pg_mid_dir, address);
pte = *pte__;
pte__ = NULL;
pte = *pte_offset(pg_mid_dir, address);

if (!pte_present(pte))
goto failed;

return ((pte_val(pte) & KERN_PAGE_MASK) | NV_MASK_OFFSET(address));

The last line above is the problem. So far I could see two possible
changes that will compile, but I do not know which will function
correctly. The first replacement option:
pte = *pte_offset(pg_mid_dir, address);

The second replacement option is more involved:
pte__ = pte_offset_map(pg_mid_dir, address);
pte = *pte__;

if (!pte_present(pte))
goto failed;


Reading the patch itself I see places where the first approach is used,
while elsewhere the second is used. I do not know what pte_val(pte)
requires though. Can we do the pte_unmap(pte__) earlier or is the
necessary for pte_present(pte)? Will this work:
pte__ = pte_offset_map(pg_mid_dir, address);
pte = *pte__;

In summary, you can see that for someone who is not intimately involved
the answers so far do not provide a working patch.

Thanks everybody.

Eyal Lebedinsky ( <>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.027 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site