[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance
    Hi Bill,

    > On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:30:28AM -0700, Mike Hayward wrote:
    > > Any ideas? Not sure I want to upgrade to the P7 architecture if this
    > > is right, since for me system calls are probably more important than
    > > raw cpu computational power.
    > This is the same for me. I'm extremely uninterested in the P-IV for my
    > own use because of this.

    I've also noticed that algorithms like the recursive one I run which
    simulates solving the Tower of Hanoi problem are most likely very hard
    to do branch prediction on. Both the code and data no doubt fit
    entirely in the L2 cache. The AMD processor below is a much lower
    cost and significantly lower clock rate (and on a machine with only a
    100Mhz Memory bus) than the Xeon, yet dramatically outperforms it with
    the same executable, compiled with gcc -march=i686 -O3. Maybe with a
    better Pentium 4 optimizing compiler the P4 and Xeon could improve a
    few percent, but I doubt it'll ever see the AMD numbers.

    Recursion Test--Tower of Hanoi

    Uni AMD XP 1800 2.4.18 kernel 46751.6 lps (10 secs, 6 samples)
    Dual Pentium 4 Xeon 2.4Ghz 2.4.19 kernel 33661.9 lps (10 secs, 6 samples)

    - Mike
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.032 / U:71.656 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site