lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: 2.5.50 Up and running but
Date
In message <20021212012101.238ae459.arashi@arashi.yi.org> you write:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:59:10 -0800
> Matt Young <wz6b@arrl.net> wrote:
>
> > Boot couldn't find the module dependency file, even though I did make modul
es
> > and make modules_install
>
> Yeah, the make rule for depmod got removed in one of the module merges. This
> will put it back. (Untested, my init scripts run depmod so it's not a big dea
l
> for me.) Rusty, am I being stupid or is this okay now that depmod
> works?

Yep, that's fine: the original modprobe replacement didn't need
modules.dep, but Adam Richter has 1300 modules and he complained about
the speed (and provided the patch to modprobe to use modules.dep, so
what could I say?)

Hopefully when Linus comes back he'll take my patches,
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans