Messages in this thread | | | From | Olaf Dietsche <olaf.dietsche#> | Subject | Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions | Date | Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:46:02 +0100 |
| |
James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au> writes:
> On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Greg KH wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:59:10PM +0100, Olaf Dietsche wrote: >> > > VERIFY_STRUCT(struct security_operations, ops, err); >> > >> > This shouldn't be necessary anymore. >> >> Good point, I'll remove it. It was a hack anyway :) >> > > I think we still want to make sure that the module author has explicitly > accounted for all of the hooks, in case new hooks are added.
VERIFY_STRUCT() now verifies, wether security_fixup_ops() has done its job. So it does no harm, but it is useless, nevertheless.
If you want to check, wether a module has been recompiled, you should add a length/sizeof(struct security_operations) parameter.
Regards, Olaf. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |