Messages in this thread | | | From | David Woodhouse <> | Subject | Re: 2.5.45 build failed with ACPI turned on | Date | Wed, 06 Nov 2002 15:08:42 +0000 |
| |
davidsen@tmr.com said: > More to the point, define CONFIG_PM as ( CONFIG_APM | CONFIG_ACPI ) > and be able to easily handle any new PM method on whatever hardware. > PM is not limited to Intel hardware. Make a new HAS_PM if reusing > CONFIG_PM creates problems.
Er, there's no reason why PM even on Intel hardware should be restricted to ACPI and APM. With appropriate chipset documentation there's nothing to stop people from writing proper driver code to enter sleep states, etc. for i386 chipsets just as we have for other architectures.
-- dwmw2
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |