lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Filesystem Capabilities in 2.6?
Date
From
A call from left field:

As a sys-admin I love the idea of the capabilities, but I hate this mount
--bind thing. I'd really rather see it have its own command name. If it were
strictly something that happens at mount time for a filesystem that'd be one
thing, but

>mount --bind --capability=xx,yy /usr/bin/foo /usr/bin/foo

looks like a mistake.

If you were loop mounting the binary into the user's directory, then I could
see using mount.

This would be clearer:

setcap -c xx,yy /usr/bin/foo

(I also have nothing against long option names.)


--
The end is a finish, a conclusion or a completion.
http://www.hacksaw.org -- http://www.privatecircus.com -- KB1FVD


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans