Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: Why /dev/sdc1 doesn't show up... | Date | Wed, 20 Nov 2002 07:58:13 +1100 |
| |
In message <20021119000924.GD6989@redhat.com> you write: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:49:21AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > > In message <Pine.GSO.4.21.0211180403440.23400-100000@steklov.math.psu.edu> you > > write: > > > Not really. For case in question (block devices) there is only one path > > > and I'd rather keep it that way, thank you very much. > > > > See other posting. This is a fundamental design decision, and it's > > not changing. Sorry. > > Then you'll have to back out the patch to module.c because it's already > changed.
Yeah, I just noticed. To be honest, I was wrong. And the code shouldn't be put back until (if ever) I have a solution which solves the races and *doesn't* break working code.
And meanwhile, there are more important things (like reducing the 400k overhead of CONFIG_KALLSYMS adds to the kernel).
Sorry for the overzealousness, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |