lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 20:41, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > Have we decided that #include'ing GPL'd code does, or does not, taint
    > otherwise "license-clean" code that includes the GPL'd code?

    Ask a lawyer - and the answer mostly is "it depends"

    > we fall to copyright law, and wonder aloud if an obviously-non-derived
    > work #includes GPL'd code, does it become derived?

    Example 1

    I paste your name and address into my document does it become
    a derived work

    Example 2

    I paste your poem into my document does it become a derived work


    So #include isnt terribly relevant 8)

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.782 / U:0.040 seconds]
    ©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean