[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules
    On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 10:17, Xavier Bestel wrote:
    > Yeah, that's precisely the problem here: the binary-only module is
    > distributed with included spinlock code, which *is* GPL.

    That doesnt neccessarily make it a derived work. Suppose I publish a
    book including a lawyer who says "Your honour I ...". That doesn't make
    it a derivative of some previous work I read that used the same phrase.

    Equally if I paraphase the entire court scene but use no identical words
    it may be a derived work.

    Stop thinking about this as a mathematical question. It isnt about the
    union of sets of instructions.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.018 / U:37.688 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site