[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Filesystem Capabilities in 2.6?

On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, David D. Hagood wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > And pathnames are a _hell_ of a lot better and straightforward interface
> > than inode numbers are. It's confusing when you change the permission on
> > one path to notice that another path magically changed too.
> Would this not allow a user to add permissions to a file, by creating a
> new directory entry and linking it to an existing inode?
> Would that not be a greater security hole?

No. The file itself has _no_ capabilities at all. If you just link to it,
you can give it whatever capabilities _you_ have as a user (well, normal
users don't really have any capabilities to give, but you get the idea).


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.181 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site