lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)
    On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 08:36:08PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:

    > > Yes please :)
    > > GTK+ is probably the most common (decent) toolkit out there - nearly any
    > > system with X has it installed, from what I've seen.
    > Oh please....
    > Wouldn't it be more helpful to iron the (few) small glitches out of the
    > qt based one than write a new one just because you don't happen to like
    > the library?

    Linus mentioned this a while ago. This kind of holy war is going to
    happen regardless of the library used. There's no reason that a
    GTK config tool would have to be merged anyway, it could live
    as a seperate project (as could the qt one really imo), outside
    the kernel sources.

    Dave

    --
    | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.019 / U:31.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site