lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 08:36:08PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > Yes please :)
> > GTK+ is probably the most common (decent) toolkit out there - nearly any
> > system with X has it installed, from what I've seen.
> Oh please....
> Wouldn't it be more helpful to iron the (few) small glitches out of the
> qt based one than write a new one just because you don't happen to like
> the library?

Linus mentioned this a while ago. This kind of holy war is going to
happen regardless of the library used. There's no reason that a
GTK config tool would have to be merged anyway, it could live
as a seperate project (as could the qt one really imo), outside
the kernel sources.

Dave

--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans