Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:56:11 -0800 | From | Dave Hansen <> | Subject | Re: unusual scheduling performance |
| |
Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Andrew Morton wrote: >> fs/eventpoll.c | 2 ++ >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >>--- 25/fs/eventpoll.c~hey Mon Nov 18 10:13:40 2002 >>+++ 25-akpm/fs/eventpoll.c Mon Nov 18 10:14:01 2002 >>@@ -328,6 +328,8 @@ void eventpoll_release(struct file *file >> if (list_empty(lsthead)) >> return; >> >>+ printk("hey!\n"); >>+ > > Andrew, if you don't use epoll there's no way you get there. The function > eventpoll_file_init() initialize the list at each file* init in > fs/file_table.c > If you're not using epoll and you get there, someone is screwing up the > data inside the struct file
That little tidbit isn't even in .47. Is that patch against one of the 2.5.47-mm's?
-- Dave Hansen haveblue@us.ibm.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |