Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] threading fix, tid-2.5.47-A3 | From | Luca Barbieri <> | Date | 17 Nov 2002 21:16:06 +0100 |
| |
> we broke binary compatibility several times, for the benefit of having a > cleaner interface. Ulrich has no problems with this approach and NPTL is > the only user of these interfaces currently. But i think you are one of > the few peoples who are running an NPTL system (ie. with the new > NPTL-glibc actually installed as the default system glibc) - is binary > compatibility important to you for this specific case? No, but since I don't see any advantage in breaking it (other than a more aesthetically pleasing header), why break it? The problem is just the numbering of the flags, not the new functionality.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |