lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] PARAM 2/4
    On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:51:48PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    [snip]
    > 2) "proper", converted-to-Rusty-style driver code is going to have
    >
    > MODULE_blah
    > MODULE_foo
    > MODULE_bar
    > PARAM
    >
    > You think that looks good??
    >
    > 3) modules a.k.a. drivers are going to be the more common users of this
    > interface.
    [snip]
    > PARAM is ugly in drivers, and way too generic.

    Why not DRIVER_PARAM in this case ? It's enough explicit and not misleading.
    I too agree that PARAM is a bit too generic.

    Cheers,
    Willy

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:3.129 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site