[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] PARAM 2/4
    In message <> you write:
    > 1) I note you ignored Matthew Wilcox's example of module_init being used
    > in two different ways.

    I didn't see it, sorry. Valid point.

    > 2) "proper", converted-to-Rusty-style driver code is going to have
    > MODULE_blah
    > MODULE_foo
    > MODULE_bar
    > PARAM
    > You think that looks good??

    Hmm... OK, you've swayed me. I'll redo the patch.

    > PARAM is ugly in drivers, and way too generic.

    Well, we completely disagree on this point. If I was starting from
    scratch, MODULE_AUTHOR would simply be AUTHOR(), etc.

    But I've always opposed this kind of "neatening" as the ultimite in
    stupidity, so consistency wins.

    Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.019 / U:216.960 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site