Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] remove hugetlb syscalls | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 14 Nov 2002 18:31:15 +0000 |
| |
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 17:51, David Mosberger-Tang wrote: > One potential downside of this is that programmers might expect > mremap(), mprotect() etc. to work on the returned memory at the > granularity of base-pages. I'm not sure though whether that was part > of the reason Linus wanted separate syscalls.
The extra syscalls dont change anything. mremap/mprotect still fails in the same way after you use them
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |