[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly
On 12 November 2002 23:28, J.A. Magall?n wrote:
> On 2002.11.04 Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> [...]
> > __constant_c_and_count_memset *has to* be inlined.
> > There is large switch statement which meant to be optimized out.
> > It does optimize out *only if* count is compile-time constant.
> I also got tons of __copy_to_user and __copy_from_user in 2.4.
> Do not show in 2.5 ?

I haven't looked.
Maybe GCC can be told to emit warnings when it does this...

> This i what I applied to my 2.4 tree:
> [snip]

Although patch seems to achieve desired effect, it isn't
included in 2.5 yet (last time I checked). I'd like to know
verdict for 2.5 first.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.044 / U:7.096 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site