[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly
    On 12 November 2002 23:28, J.A. Magall?n wrote:
    > On 2002.11.04 Denis Vlasenko wrote:
    > [...]
    > > __constant_c_and_count_memset *has to* be inlined.
    > > There is large switch statement which meant to be optimized out.
    > > It does optimize out *only if* count is compile-time constant.
    > I also got tons of __copy_to_user and __copy_from_user in 2.4.
    > Do not show in 2.5 ?

    I haven't looked.
    Maybe GCC can be told to emit warnings when it does this...

    > This i what I applied to my 2.4 tree:
    > [snip]

    Although patch seems to achieve desired effect, it isn't
    included in 2.5 yet (last time I checked). I'd like to know
    verdict for 2.5 first.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.020 / U:51.612 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site