lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: module mess in -CURRENT
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 04:59:35PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > Linus, please backout that patch until we a) have modutils that support
> > both the new and old code and b) support at least such basic features
> > as parsing modules.conf and supporting parameters.
>
> Quite frankly, at this time a backout means that the thing doesn't go in
> _at_all_.

Probably. Or just the non-intrusive parts.

> It came in before the feature freeze, but I decided that instead of having
> a totally hectic time I woul dmerge stuff that I got before the freeze at
> my own leisure, but backing it out now would be basically saying it's not
> going into 2.6.x. And I think it's worth it.

I don't think it's a must have and absolutely don't think it's worth
breaking about everything at this stage. Please tell me why rusty can't
send a large number of non-intrusive patches that do one thing at a
time just like everyone else?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.058 / U:0.916 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site