[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Dan Kegel wrote:

> Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >>Do you avoid the cost of epoll_ctl() per new fd?
> >
> > Jamie, the cost of epoll_ctl(2) is minimal/zero compared with the average
> > life of a connection.
> Depends on the workload. Where I work, the http client I'm writing
> has to perform extremely well even on 1 byte files with HTTP 1.0.
> Minimizing system calls is suprisingly important - even
> a gettimeofday hurts.

Dan, is it _one_ gettimeofday() or a gettimeofday() inside a loop ?
gettimeofday() is of the order of few microseconds ... and If your clients
works with anything alse than a loopback, few microseconds shouldn't weigh
in much compared to connect/send/recv/close on a network connection. It is
not much the fact that you transfer one byte, it's the whole TCP handshake
cost that weighs in.

- Davide

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.175 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site