lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: What's left over.

    On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Bill Davidsen wrote:
    >
    > If you really believed the stuff you say you'd put it in and promise to
    > take it out if people didn't find it useful or there were inherent
    > limitations.

    This never works. Be honest. Nobody takes out features, they are stuck
    once they get in. Which is exactly why my job is to say "no", and why
    there is no "accepted unless proven bad".

    > It would probably take 10-30% off the time to a stable release.

    Talk is cheap.

    I've not seen a _single_ bug-report with a fix that attributed the
    existing LKCD patches. I might be more impressed if I had.

    The basic issue is that we don't put patches in in the hope that they will
    prove themselves later. Your argument is fundamentally flawed.

    Linus

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.027 / U:31.064 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site