Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Oct 2002 07:34:04 -0700 (PDT) | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: linux kernel conf 0.8 |
| |
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Brendan J Simon wrote:
| Roman Zippel wrote: | | >>But the fact that xconfig depends on QT is going to make some people hate | >>it. | >> | >> | >This should be rather easily fixable, but it has to be done by someone who | >is more familiar with whatever prefered toolkit. I'm familiar with QT and | >it's absolutely great to get quickly reasonable results, if someone wants | >something else I gladly will help, but I can't do it myself. | >The interface to the back end is quite simple so it should be no real | >problem to add a different user interface. | > | | This is a difficult one. GUI's toolkits are a bit of religion | (fundamentalist types too). | [good descriptions snipped] | | I'm pretty sure there is no one solution and it comes down to the | politics and preferences of the final decision makers up the heirarchy. | | Good luck,
stick with TCL/TK, like xconfig currently uses ? or is it not sufficient? or just too ugly?
-- ~Randy "In general, avoiding problems is better than solving them." -- from "#ifdef Considered Harmful", Spencer & Collyer, USENIX 1992.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |