lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Good Idea (tm): Code Consolidation for Functions and Macros that Access the Process Address Space
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 07:58:55PM -0500, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
> SUBJECT: Good Idea (tm): Code Consolidation for Functions and Macros
> that Access the Process Address Space
>...
> Remember, if a function call has no place for a returned value to go,
> nothing bad happens; the returned value is simply ignored/discarded.

And the compiler warning?

> SOLUTION:

Get rid of the _ret forms. Their use is frowned on today anyway because
they hide the real meaning of what the code is trying to do, and hiding
the fact that a function can return in the middle of what looks like a
macro call is _REAL_ _BAD_.

--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.052 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site