Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 6 Oct 2002 23:38:44 -0300 (BRT) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: New BK License Problem? |
| |
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > People can grab the repository for use with CSSC from: > > > > ftp://nl.linux.org/pub/linux/bk2patch/ > > Make sure you do a > bk -r admin -Znone > on that tree. We support gzipped repos, SCCS/CSSC don't.
Thanks for the advise, I'm running this command right now.
Does this need to be run every time I pull changes into the tree or is it enough that I run it once ?
Now, with any vendor locking arguments out of the way the various source control systems should be able to compete on a level ground. If you (for random values of 'you') want to put the Linux kernel source in another source control system and/or you develop another source control system, you won't need bitkeeper in order to do so ...
I won't be holding my breath for a better tool than bitkeeper, though ... it'll probably be quite a while for the other source control tools to come close to the functionality I'm using on a daily basis ;)
regards,
Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |