Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: O(1) Scheduler from Ingo vs. O(1) Scheduler from Robert | From | Robert Love <> | Date | 04 Oct 2002 15:28:37 -0400 |
| |
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 11:28, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> On 4 Oct 2002, Robert Love wrote: > > > There should _not_ be other things in the patch aside from the > > scheduler. [...] > > hm, i remember there was some 'set max RT priority in .config' stuff > in it, isnt that the case anymore?
Oh, yes, indeed. I forgot about that.
Since we cleaned up the whole MAX_PRIO thing the only main difference in my tree is that fact it is exported as a CONFIG setting (and the logic to implement a new ffs if BITMAP_SIZE changes).
Otherwise the trees aim to be in-sync.
Robert Love
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |