lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Reiser vs EXT3
David C. Hansen wrote:

>On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 13:51, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
>>If you want to talk about 2.6 then you should talk about reiser4 not
>>reiserfs v3, and reiser4 is 7.6 times the write performance of ext3 for
>>30 copies of the linux kernel source code using modern IDE drives and
>>modern processors on a dual-CPU box, so I don't think any amount of
>>improved scalability will make ext3 competitive with reiser4 for
>>performance usages.
>>
>>We haven't had anyone test performance using RAID yet for reiser4, that
>>could be fun.
>>
>>
>
>I have a 14-drive hardware RAID array on an 8-proc box. Is that the
>kind of thing you want testing on? If you want to send me some testing
>scripts, I'll run them.
>
>
>
Yes, that would be cool.

Green, please respond to this email with details for him.

--
Hans


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans