lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Reiser vs EXT3
    David C. Hansen wrote:

    >On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 13:51, Hans Reiser wrote:
    >
    >
    >>If you want to talk about 2.6 then you should talk about reiser4 not
    >>reiserfs v3, and reiser4 is 7.6 times the write performance of ext3 for
    >>30 copies of the linux kernel source code using modern IDE drives and
    >>modern processors on a dual-CPU box, so I don't think any amount of
    >>improved scalability will make ext3 competitive with reiser4 for
    >>performance usages.
    >>
    >>We haven't had anyone test performance using RAID yet for reiser4, that
    >>could be fun.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >I have a 14-drive hardware RAID array on an 8-proc box. Is that the
    >kind of thing you want testing on? If you want to send me some testing
    >scripts, I'll run them.
    >
    >
    >
    Yes, that would be cool.

    Green, please respond to this email with details for him.

    --
    Hans


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.035 / U:92.988 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site