lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CONFIG_TINY
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 05:52:59PM +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> Matt Porter <porter@cox.net> wrote:
> >Thank you. This is exactly why in the last CONFIG_TINY thread I made
> >it clear that a one-size-fits-all option is not all that helpful for
> >serious embedded systems designers.
> >
> >Collecting these parameters in a single tweaks.h file and perhaps using
> >things like CONFIG_TINY, CONFIG_DESKTOP, CONFIG_FOO as profile selectors
>
> In an ideal world there would be several options invidually
> selectable.

But there is? Please look at 2.5.44-config. Or did I misunderstand
you. Anyways, this work is far from the point where how this is
selected is a major concern.

Regards,
Rasmus
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.143 / U:0.764 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site