Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 31 Oct 2002 18:49:00 +0100 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: CONFIG_TINY |
| |
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:24:05AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > Yes, and I'm saying that CONFIG_TINY shouldn't exist. It should be > CONFIG_FINE_TUNE (or so), to allow anyone to fine tune the optimization > level. If the flexibility is wanted then it should be something like: CONFIG_TINY_GCCOPTFLAG default 2 It should be a string so the developer can choose freely the optimisation level.
Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |