lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CONFIG_TINY
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:24:05AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> Yes, and I'm saying that CONFIG_TINY shouldn't exist. It should be
> CONFIG_FINE_TUNE (or so), to allow anyone to fine tune the optimization
> level.
If the flexibility is wanted then it should be something like:
CONFIG_TINY_GCCOPTFLAG
default 2
It should be a string so the developer can choose freely the optimisation
level.

Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans