lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: AIM Bench Mark results for different kernels
Date
From
Hi Andrew,

Thanks for your feedback.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@digeo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:19 PM
> To: Pavan Kumar Reddy N.S.
> Cc: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: AIM Bench Mark results for different kernels
>
>
> "Pavan Kumar Reddy N.S." wrote:
> >
> >
> > AIM Independent Resource Benchmark - Suite IX v1.1, January
> 22, 1996
> > Copyright (c) 1996 - 2001 Caldera International, Inc. All Rights
> > Reserved
> >
> >
>
> Thanks.
>
> This would be enormously less painful to read if you could
> fix your mailer to not word-wrap your content.

I will take care of this...

>
> All the compute-intensive workloads are down ~1% because of
> the increase of HZ from 100 to 1000.
>
> Things like "sequential disk reads (K)/second" would be more
> interesting if they were accompanied by CPU utilisation. But
> then, CPU utilisation comparisons with 2.4 kernels are
> suspect because of the HZ change. Probably it would be more
> informative if the 2.5 kernel was altered to run at HZ=100,
> or run 2.4 at HZ-1000.

I will rerun for all the kernels after changing the HZ as you
Mentioned above. I will try to give the CPU utilization
Information along with the above results.

>
> 2.5.43 outperformed 2.5.42 and 2.5.44 by a *lot* in many
> tests. That is unexpected. It might be worth double-checking
> that result.
>
I will.
**************************Disclaimer**************************************************

Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged'
and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is
addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information
contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited.

****************************************************************************************
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.142 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site