[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (WAS Re: [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem logging macros, SCSI RAIDdevice)
    On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:

    > The memory management issues would qualify for 3.0, but my argument
    > there is really that I doubt everybody really is happy yet.

    I'm absolutely convinced some people won't be happy, simply
    because of the fundamental limitations of global page replacement.
    However, Andrew Morton has done a great job and the 2.5 VM seems
    to be looking as good as anything we've had before.

    For me 3.0 arguments would be Ingo's threading stuff, not anything


    A: No.
    Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.045 / U:0.836 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site