lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (WAS Re: [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem logging macros, SCSI RAIDdevice)
    On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:

    > The memory management issues would qualify for 3.0, but my argument
    > there is really that I doubt everybody really is happy yet.

    I'm absolutely convinced some people won't be happy, simply
    because of the fundamental limitations of global page replacement.
    However, Andrew Morton has done a great job and the 2.5 VM seems
    to be looking as good as anything we've had before.

    For me 3.0 arguments would be Ingo's threading stuff, not anything
    else.

    regards,

    Rik
    --
    A: No.
    Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

    http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.043 / U:30.836 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site