[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subject[RFC]partitions through device-mapper

now that the device mapper is merged into mainline, I would like to open a
discussion on the possible in-kernel partition handling clean-up.

In-kernel partition handling covers :
o parsing of the on-disk partition tables
o partition block devices creation / structs

Along with initramfs will come the possibility to rip off the partition tables
parsing from the kernel : a userspace parser like partx (part of util-linux
toolset) can teach the kernel the partition layout.

As driverfs provides elegantly block device add/remove events to hotplug, calls
to partx can be wrapped into the block.agent

The device-mapper merging could enable the ripping of all kernel partition
understanding by creating linear device-maps over partitions.

As a proof of concept, I've mutated partx to create those mappings. This tool
is available for testing and commenting at :

This tool cannot damage your data : BLKPG_DEL_PARTITION and
BLKPG_ADD_PARTITION ioctls are removed from the source.

I would like to receive feedback over the following points :

* Is this proposal completely out of the point ? Have I overlooked some
important implementation details ?

* driverfs send block device-removal-event at the end of the job, but device
removal cannot happen as there are device-mappings over it. This ordering
forbids hotplug to trigger the partition-mappings flush before block-device
removal. Can this ordering be changed, or is there another solution ?

* 2.5.44-ac4 did not notify block-device-add upon scsi disk insertion with
scsi-add-single-device, which I think is known by scsi subsystem maintainers.
-> The block.agent provided with dmpartx is not tested.

* Should dmpartx create the 0-lengh partitions ? It does not at the moment.
Extended partitions are handled the same way as partx : resize to 63 blocks

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.056 / U:0.548 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site