Messages in this thread | | | From | Erich Focht <> | Subject | Re: NUMA scheduler (was: 2.5 merge candidate list 1.5) | Date | Tue, 29 Oct 2002 23:39:55 +0100 |
| |
On Monday 28 October 2002 18:36, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > >> Schedbench 4: > >> Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys AvgUser > >> 2.5.44-mm4 32.45 49.47 129.86 0.82 > >> 2.5.44-mm4-focht-1 38.61 45.15 154.48 1.06 > >> 2.5.44-mm4-hbaum-1 37.81 46.44 151.26 0.78 > >> 2.5.44-mm4-focht-12 23.23 38.87 92.99 0.85 > >> 2.5.44-mm4-hbaum-12 22.26 34.70 89.09 0.70 > >> 2.5.44-mm4-f1-h2 21.39 35.97 85.57 0.81 > > > > One more remarks: > > You seem to have made the numa_test shorter. That reduces it to beeing > > simply a check for the initial load balancing as the hackbench running in > > the background (and aimed to disturb the initial load balancing) might > > start too late. You will most probably not see the impact of node > > affinity with such short running tests. But we weren't talking about node > > affinity, yet... > > I didn't modify what you sent me at all ... perhaps my machine is > just faster than yours? > > /me ducks & runs ;-)
Aaargh, now I understand!!! You just have wrong labels in your table, they are permuted! More sense makes:
> >> AvgUser Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys > >> 2.5.44-mm4 32.45 49.47 129.86 0.82 > >> 2.5.44-mm4-focht-1 38.61 45.15 154.48 1.06 > >> 2.5.44-mm4-hbaum-1 37.81 46.44 151.26 0.78 > >> 2.5.44-mm4-focht-12 23.23 38.87 92.99 0.85 > >> 2.5.44-mm4-hbaum-12 22.26 34.70 89.09 0.70 > >> 2.5.44-mm4-f1-h2 21.39 35.97 85.57 0.81
Regards, Erich
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |