[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Updated sys_epoll now with man pages
Hanna Linder wrote:
> sys_epoll-2.5.44-last.diff


when I took a 15-minute look at this code last week I found several
bugs, some of which were grave. It's a terrible thing to say, but
a sensible person would expect that a closer inspection would turn
up more problems.

Now, adding bugs to existing code is fine and traditional - people
find them quickly and they get fixed up.

But for *new* code, problems will take months to discover. The only
practical way to get this code vetted for inclusion is a close review.

And that is a sizeable task. The core implementation file is
1,600 lines. And I wonder how many people have counted the
number of comments in there?

Well, I'll make it easy: zero. Nil. Nada.

(Well, OK, a copyright header, and something which got cut-n-pasted
from inode.c)

In my wildly unconventional opinion this alone makes epoll just a hack,
of insufficient quality for inclusion in Linux. We *have* to stop doing
this to ourselves!

epoll seems to be a good and desirable thing. To move forward I
believe we need to get this code reviewed, and documented.

I can do that if you like; it will take me several weeks to get onto
it. But until that is completed I would oppose inclusion of this
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.137 / U:2.764 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site