[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Updated sys_epoll now with man pages
    Hanna Linder wrote:
    > sys_epoll-2.5.44-last.diff


    when I took a 15-minute look at this code last week I found several
    bugs, some of which were grave. It's a terrible thing to say, but
    a sensible person would expect that a closer inspection would turn
    up more problems.

    Now, adding bugs to existing code is fine and traditional - people
    find them quickly and they get fixed up.

    But for *new* code, problems will take months to discover. The only
    practical way to get this code vetted for inclusion is a close review.

    And that is a sizeable task. The core implementation file is
    1,600 lines. And I wonder how many people have counted the
    number of comments in there?

    Well, I'll make it easy: zero. Nil. Nada.

    (Well, OK, a copyright header, and something which got cut-n-pasted
    from inode.c)

    In my wildly unconventional opinion this alone makes epoll just a hack,
    of insufficient quality for inclusion in Linux. We *have* to stop doing
    this to ourselves!

    epoll seems to be a good and desirable thing. To move forward I
    believe we need to get this code reviewed, and documented.

    I can do that if you like; it will take me several weeks to get onto
    it. But until that is completed I would oppose inclusion of this
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.032 / U:0.864 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site