Messages in this thread |  | | From | Rusty Russell <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch | | Date | Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:06:49 +1100 |
| |
In message <3DBDB51B.84F97EC1@us.ibm.com> you write: > > Yes, this is the typical RCU model, except that in this case (IPC), > > I am not quite sure if it is in effect that different from what Ming/Hugh > > have done. > > Rusty's patch looks good to me. I would like to replace the mempool in > IPC with this typical RCU model. Rusty, if you like, I will make a patch > against mm6. There need some cleanups. One thing is that ipc_alloc() > are called by other places(besides grow_ary()), and they don't need to > the RCU header structure.
Yes, I noticed that, but I'm not sure it's worth separating ipc_alloc() and ipc_rcu_alloc() for a couple of temporary allocations.
Anyway, glad you like the patch, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |