[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll
    On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Martin Waitz wrote:

    > hi :)
    > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:14:19AM -0800, Hanna Linder wrote:
    > > The results of our testing show not only does the system call
    > > interface to epoll perform as well as the /dev interface but also that epoll
    > > is many times better than standard poll. No other implementations of poll
    > > have performed as well as epoll in any measure. Testing details and results
    > > are published here, please take a minute to check it out:
    > how does this compare to the kqueue mechanism found in {Free,Net}BSD?
    > (see
    > i especially like their combined event update/event wait,
    > needing only one syscall per poll while building a changelist in
    > userspace...
    > a replacement for poll/select is _really_ needed.
    > but i think we should use existing interfaces if possible,
    > to reduce the changes needed in userspace.

    KQueue has not been tested simply because it does not ( to my knowledge )
    have patches to apply to lk. I'd expect kqueue to scale in a similar way
    of sys_epoll though. Where for "similar" I mean to not suffer high
    connection load drops. About the interface, it looks pretty simple to me :

    - Davide

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.021 / U:59.900 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site