Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:36:45 -0800 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: NUMA scheduler (was: 2.5 merge candidate list 1.5) |
| |
>> Schedbench 4: >> Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys AvgUser >> 2.5.44-mm4 32.45 49.47 129.86 0.82 >> 2.5.44-mm4-focht-1 38.61 45.15 154.48 1.06 >> 2.5.44-mm4-hbaum-1 37.81 46.44 151.26 0.78 >> 2.5.44-mm4-focht-12 23.23 38.87 92.99 0.85 >> 2.5.44-mm4-hbaum-12 22.26 34.70 89.09 0.70 >> 2.5.44-mm4-f1-h2 21.39 35.97 85.57 0.81 > > One more remarks: > You seem to have made the numa_test shorter. That reduces it to beeing > simply a check for the initial load balancing as the hackbench running in > the background (and aimed to disturb the initial load balancing) might > start too late. You will most probably not see the impact of node affinity > with such short running tests. But we weren't talking about node affinity, > yet...
I didn't modify what you sent me at all ... perhaps my machine is just faster than yours?
/me ducks & runs ;-)
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |