lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:32:54PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> So what's your own particular problem with BK again if you don't have to use
> it?

I didn't mention that I had a problem with it. I do have some
questions.

If I one day had the idea of building a filesystem where version
control is inherent, could this be done with BK? Further, I
understand the design of EXT3 uses a form of multiversion concurrency
to ensure metadata integrity. Does this constitute "substantially
similar capabilities?" That's pretty damn vague.

> I hope you still have the hability to write and contribute GPL'ed code.

--
Allen Campbell | Lurking at the bottom of the
allenc@verinet.com | gravity well, getting old.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:1.632 / U:0.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site