Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:48:53 +0100 | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] use 1ULL instead of 1UL in kernel/signal.c |
| |
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:57:59PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 22:27, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > On PA-RISC we have 36 signals defined for hpux compatibility. So M() > > and T() in kernel/signal.c try to do (1UL << 33) which is garbage on 32-bit > > architectures. How do people feel about this patch? > > How does the compiler output look ?
uhh.. 200 bytes extra on x86 ;-(
-rw-r--r-- 1 willy users 17956 Oct 22 14:44 kernel/signal.o -rw-r--r-- 1 willy users 17748 Oct 22 06:50 kernel/signal.o_orig
-- Revolutions do not require corporate support. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |