lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new
    Date
    Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> writes:

    >Hi,

    >On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Murray J. Root wrote:

    >> It's a simple concept. I produced it, it's mine until I say otherwise.
    >> You grant other laborers the right to profit from their labors, do you
    >> not?

    >Software isn't a product like others, once you've written it, you can
    >reproduce it indefinitely with almost no further costs. Profit is defined

    Not if you can tie it to some "not indefinitely at no further costs
    reproducable" item. E.g. Hardware. E.g. a serial number in hardware or
    an encryption key.

    <div sarcasm="true">
    What? what? Sounds familiar? Maybe someone else came
    to the same conclusions?
    </div>

    Regards
    Henning

    --
    Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer
    INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH hps@intermeta.de

    Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 info@intermeta.de
    D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.029 / U:0.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site