[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5)
    Mark Mielke wrote:
    > epoll is not a poll()/select() enhancement (unless it is used in
    > conjuction with poll()/select()). It is a poll()/select()
    > replacement.
    > Meaning... purposefully creating an API that is designed the way one
    > would design a poll()/select() loop is purposefully limiting the benefits
    > of /dev/epoll.
    > It's like inventing a power drill to replace the common screw driver,
    > but rather than plugging the power drill in, manually turning the
    > drill as if it was a socket wrench for the drill bit.
    > I find it an excercise in self defeat... except that /dev/epoll used the
    > same way one would use poll()/select() happens to perform better even
    > when it is crippled.

    - Dan

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.019 / U:27.920 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site