[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch
"Martin J. Bligh" <> writes:

> >> For reference, one of the tests was TPC-H. My code reduced the number of
> >> allocated pte_chains from 5 million to 50 thousand.
> >
> > Don't tease, what did that do for performance? I see that someone has
> > already posted a possible problem, and the code would pass for complex for
> > most people, so is the gain worth the pain?
> In many cases, this will stop the box from falling over flat on it's
> face due to ZONE_NORMAL exhaustion (from pte-chains), or even total
> RAM exhaustion (from PTEs). Thus the performance gain is infinite ;-)

So why has no one written a pte_chain reaper? It is perfectly sane
to allocate a swap entry and move an entire pte_chain to the swap

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.077 / U:1.644 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site