lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] thread-aware coredumps, 2.5.43-C3
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:29:33PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 17:40, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > My only problem with this is that you're waiting for all threads by
> > SIGKILLing them. If a process vforks or clones, and then the child
> > crashes, the parent will receive a SIGKILL - iff we are dumping core.
> > That's a change in behavior that seems a bit too arbitrary to me.
>
> It also has a security impact when you construct a fork/fork/crash
> sequence that sends sigkill to the module loader or a kernel thread
> during start up that has not yet dropped its association with the user
> code.

Why? It's not like userspace couldn't send that SIGKILL on its own,
right? If it's still killable it had better be safe to do so.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.077 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site