lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Device-mapper submission 6/7
From
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:59:05AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> This is a _new_ addition, so from our perspective we want to get it
> right(tm) and change things now. I know this differs from your
> perspective, but that's really a different context and [bluntly] doesn't
> matter.
>
> Adding ioctls now and then removing them later is a software engineering
> no-no. Save everyone lots of headache and ditch them now.

I'm forced to agree with you, but have a couple of concerns:

Is there anyone out there who is going to argue against using an fs
interface when I submit it ? Speak now or forever hold your peace !

If dm now misses the feature freeze deadline due to this extra work,
is it going to be possible to still place it in 2.5 at a later date ?
(dm with an ioctl interface is better than no dm at all).

- Joe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.064 / U:9.580 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site