[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] statfs64 no longer missing
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 10:19:19AM +1000, Peter Chubb wrote:
> I didn't add a passed-in argument of expected size, as I think that
> statfs64 is well enough understood (and there are 5 spare longs
> anyway).

That's what we thought about fstat last time, too. Trust me, there will
always be a reason to add more fields, and considering that one of the 64
bit platforms we're using today will likely still be around in 10 years,
just adding the size parameter is easy enough to save a pile of hassel

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.059 / U:6.844 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site