[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.5.41 still not testable by end users
Thomas Molina wrote:
> ...
> > > Oct 16 21:40:59 declan kernel: [__might_sleep+84/96]
> > > ...
> > > Oct 16 21:41:00 declan kernel: [init_irq+637/820] init_irq+0x27d/0x334
> > >
> >
> > One day. Before we all die. Please.
> I had that as fixed in my problem list. It should have been integrated by
> 2.5.42, certainly 2.5.43. I'm not seeing any additional reports since
> then.

Oh. We still have:

if (request_irq(hwif->irq,&ide_intr,sa,hwif->name,hwgroup)) {
if (!match)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ide_lock, flags);

request_irq() was changed to use GFP_ATOMIC, so it's "fixed".

But only for i386.

request_irq() inside spinlock is a *very* common bug. Moreso
as people move cli()-using code across to use spinlocks.

And we've just lost our ability to detect this bug.

request_irq() needs to take the allocation mode as an argument.
Should always have. Sigh. I'll fix it up sometime.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.102 / U:0.960 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site