lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] Add POSIX Access Control Lists to ext2/3
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 12:04:08PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Hello Nathan,

hi there,

> On Thursday 17 October 2002 00:48, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > They are an optimisization for the one special case (posix acls),
> > and manage to pollute the VFS for that one special case ...
> ...
> As soon as any filesystem independent part of the kernel needs an interface
> more efficient that pass-by-value we will again have exactly the same
> problem.

My point is simply that a proposal to extend the VFS in this way needs
to be accompanied by a compelling argument showing the performance bump
that its providing.

> Going to disk and fetching EAs only causes disk accesses once; afterwards the
> block is cached.

Good - this is true for both XFS and ext2/3 then. So, we are talking about
using ref counting vs. copying for any in-kernel users of attrs, and you're
saying there is some significant overheads with copying and I'm saying show
me what kind of overheads we're talking about, please.

cheers.

--
Nathan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.084 / U:39.636 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site