[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: statfs64 missing
On 17 Oct 02 at 15:41, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 02:01:11AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> ...
> > So it boils down to if the new fields are important enough to justify
> > the pain they cause on 64bit.
> >
> > (I ran into a similar issue with my nanosecond stat patchkit -
> > alpha stat is 64bit clean, but doesn't have the padding for ns fields
> > added used in later ports)
> If any new stat() type syscalls are added, make sure that a length parameter
> of the structure gets passed in from userland, as that way we will be able
> to extend the available information without introducing yet another syscall
> on every arch (this has happened enough times now that we should try to get
> it right).

And if VFS could get access to dentry which was used for statfs,
I (and ncpfs) will be very happy, as then I can report space available
for user after applying directory restrictions just through normal
statfs call, instead of using own special call.

I understand that then it becomes more inode than superblock operation,
and that it is too late for 2.6...
Petr Vandrovec

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.030 / U:1.020 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site