Messages in this thread | | | From | "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <> | Date | Wed, 16 Oct 2002 03:15:45 +0800 | Subject | Re:Benchmark results from resp1 trivial response time test |
| |
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> > On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > > > Hi Bill, > > I'm back with the results of others tests, here all my results: > > Thanks, I'll cip them in the response, but this test sure does make some > kernels unhappy, doesn't it? And the sad truth is that this isn't > artifact, if you get a similar "real load" on the machine the response > will be really unusable in real life. Yeah, but it also means that 2.5.42-mm2 is the winner, and I have the same feeling just using it, so I think we'll see a 2.5.43 very responsive ;-)
Did you try 2.5.42-mm3 ?
Ciao, Paolo -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org
Powered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |