Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:02:15 -0700 | From | "Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy" <> | Subject | [RFC] Rename _bh to _softirq |
| |
Hi Folks,
Old BHs have been almost completely replaced with tasklets and softirqs. Should we then rename _bh to _softirq ? i.e local_bh_disable() -> local_softirq_disable() spin_lock_bh() -> spin_lock_softirq() bh_lock_sock() -> softirq_sock_lock() etc
Or maybe just 'si' if softirq is too long.
bh prefix and postfix seem to be confusing now.
Max
http://bluez.sf.net http://vtun.sf.net
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |